Cailfornia to adopt the I-Codes!
After several years of aggravation with alternate codes, California
will finally join the rest of the nation in the adoption of the
I-Codes. This news release from the ICC:
California Building Standards Commission Withdraws 2003 Code Recommendations
Decision Clears Way for State Agencies to Proceed with International Building, Fire and Residential Codes
Sacramento, CA: The California Building Standards Commission voted 8-2
on Wednesday, March 16, to rescind its code recommendations of July
2003. The Commission's action will allow state agencies to move forward
with the adoption of building codes that are the best fit for
California, including the International Building Code (IBC), the
International Fire Code (IFC) and the International Residential Code
(IRC), in updating the State's building codes. The state agencies will
bring proposed code amendments back to the Building Standards
Commission for approval -- a process that is estimated to take about
two years. This approach is consistent with how California has adopted
building codes in the past.
Today's decision sets a course that will help ensure the highest level
of building and fire safety in places where Californians live,
work and play, said James Lee Witt, CEO of the International Code
Council. We applaud the California Building Standards Commission for
undertaking a detailed analysis of the codes and making public safety
interests its first priority.
The Building Standards Commission's action followed a unanimous 7-0
recommendation issued on March 8 by the Commission's Coordinating
Council, made up of the State's code-writing agencies, in support of
the IBC, IFC and IRC. Public testimony in support of the IBC, IRC
and IFC before both the Coordinating Council and the Building Standards
Commission registered overwhelmingly in favor of using the I-Codes in
California. More than 500 private and non-profit entities, as
well as individuals, support the I-Codes in California.
The I-Codes are the most widely recognized building codes in the
country. The IBC is adopted and enforced in 44 states at the state or
local level and Washington DC. The Department of Defense, Department of
State, Department of Commerce, General Services Administration,
Department of Housing and Urban Development, and National Parks Service
also use the IBC.
The International Code Council has extensive experience working with
California state and local government agencies. The Uniform Codes
currently used in California are the predecessors of the I-Codes. The
International Code Council's 100-plus employees at offices in
Sacramento and Whittier provide technical, training, certification and
other support services.
The International Code Council, a membership association dedicated to
building safety and fire prevention, develops the codes used to
construct residential and commercial buildings, including homes and
schools. Most U.S. cities, counties and states that adopt codes choose
the International Codes developed by the International Code Council.
The California Building Standards Commission voted March 16, 2005, to rescind its July 29, 2003, decision by an 8-2 vote to select the National Fire Protection Association's NFPA 5000 as California's next building code. Other codes included in the decision to rescind were the NFPA 1 Fire Code, and the International Code Council's (ICC) International Residential Code.
More history. This from Architectural Record:
"At one time, Quincy, Mass.-based NFPA
and Falls Church, Va.-based ICC collaborated to develop a
single national code, but they split in 1998 over the approach
(ENR 8/5/02 p. 10). ICC gave precedence to the views of architects
and code enforcers, while NFPA's code developers gave greater
weight to the views of vendors and unions. Critics claimed
NFPA 5000's many references to other codes would make enforcement
unwieldy. Others said that either code would need state amendments
but NFPA 5000 would be more difficult to work with. Gary Keith,
NFPA's vice president responsible for the building codes campaign,
says California's move "is not going to change our strategy
at this point." He says California's action is more about
"politics than the technical review."


Reader Comments